Quality improvement final project

If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality, and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. We are the ideal place for all your writing needs.

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper


To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of the Quality Improvement Project.

Evaluate the clinical project.

Putting it all together for the final Quality Improvement Project.

Content Requirements:

A description of the clinical issue to be addressed in the project.

A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis for the project. Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the quality improvement process.

An outline of the action plan for the project.

An assessment of clinical issue that is the focus of the quality improvement project.

Discuss stakeholders and decision makers who need to be involved in the quality improvement project.

Discuss resources including budget, personnel and time needed for the quality improvement project.

Discuss potential strategies for implementation and evaluation.


Submission Instructions:

The work is to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.

The final project is to be 8 – 12 pages in length and formatted per current APA, excluding the title, abstract and references page.

Incorporate a minimum of 9 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).



Quality Improvement Project – Sepsis Action Plan

Student’s Name:

Course Name:

Institution Affiliation:

SWOT Analysis of Sepsis

SWOT analysis would involve analyzing thee strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of sepsis as a clinical issue in the healthcare industry. Consequently, this would serve to form the basis of providing foundation for an action plan for quality improvement of sepsis. One of the biggest strengths regarding sepsis is that its screening has aided in saving many lives today. According to data from the National Library of Medicine, sepsis screening has aided in reducing the mortality rate (Kim & Park, 2019). Reduced mortality rate has been attributed to the early identification and treatment of sepsis. Undeniably, sepsis screening has been enhanced through use of tools such as the systemic inflammatory response system (SIRS). Further, these sepsis screening tools have enhanced efficiency and effectiveness in terms of detecting sepsis.

For these reason, morbidity and mortality rates related to sepsis have massively reduced thus improving the overall efficiency of health systems globally. However, despite the strength, there exist weaknesses regarding the clinical issue of sepsis. For instance, one of the biggest weaknesses has been the issue of non-compliance especially of bedside nurses completing the sepsis screening. Bedside nurses refer to healthcare professionals who handle the personal healthcare issues of patients. In this scenario, this has always led to delays in utilization and positive impacts of sepsis bundle. Delayed sepsis bundle would then increase the risk of progression to septic shock. It is crucial to point out that delayed septic bundle is linked to a more than twofold rise in mortality rates of patients with sepsis after onset. On the flip side, sepsis as a clinical issue has presented numerous opportunities for healthcare professionals, patients and the system itself. First, reducing mortality rates related to sepsis is one of the most significant aspects that can be explored by healthcare professionals globally.

To achieve this, the healthcare system and professionals must leverage on boosting early detection and treatment of sepsis to help save many lives globally (Carr, 2018). On top of this, there opportunity to develop a fast-acting treatment plan for sepsis without considering the source of the infection has present itself to the global healthcare system. Additionally, there still exist threats when dealing with the clinical issue of sepsis. Patients in today’s healthcare system are at an increased risk of sepsis. A classic example would be patients undergoing foley catherer as this would increase the risk of sepsis (Melzer & Welch, 2017). On top of this, patients would be at risk of an infection that can then lead to sepsis and this can also be attributed to time spent by a patient in hospital.

Action Plan for Quality Improvement

It would be essential to integrate the systemic inflammatory response system (SIRS), as an analytical tool bas it has proven to be effective in undertaking of screening of patients to effectively and efficiently detect and identify sepsis. Over time, SIRS has remained to be one of the most commonly utilized sepsis screening tool when identifying septic patients. Additionally, it is important apart from using SIRS, healthcare professionals ought to diversify their analytical frameworks when detecting and identifying sepsis (Ebai, 2017). Apart from focusing all efforts and actions plans in the healthcare environment, there is need to also focus on the outside. Specifically, there is need to accelerate sessions and training to parents and communities in terms of sepsis awareness and this can be accelerated through use of social media as a means of communication. Eventually, sepsis awareness would aid in timely and effective response to sepsis thus saving many lives in the short and long run. To sum up, investing in research and development of technologies aimed at boosting detection and identification of sepsis would be a game changer in improving health outcomes of patients in the long run.


Carr, C. F. (2018). Tools to Increase Compliance and Decrease Mortality Due to Sepsis.
The University of Southern Mississippi

Ebai, D. B. (2017). Screening Tools Used by Nurses to Identify Sepsis in Adult Patients.

Kim, H. I., & Park, S. (2019). Sepsis: Early recognition and optimized treatment. 
Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases
82(1), 6-14.

Melzer, M., & Welch, C. (2017). Does the presence of a urinary catheter predict severe sepsis in a bacteraemic cohort? 
Journal of Hospital Infection
95(4), 376-382.


Quality Improvement Project of Sepsis

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Name

Instructor’s Name

Due Date

Quality Improvement Project of Sepsis

Quality improvement of specific conditions will require various people to come together to achieve the improvement objective. Sepsis is a serious health condition in our environment affecting people and proving to be a killer condition if not diagnosed early. In the quality improvement of sepsis, various stakeholders come together to achieve the goal of educating people concerning sepsis. The different stakeholders that will be impacted by the quality improvement project of sepsis educational quality include:

1. Patients: Patients are the ones who will be directly impacted by the quality of sepsis education they receive (Hughes et al., 2019). They are the ones who will suffer the consequences of poor sepsis education, or benefit from improved sepsis education.

2. Family members: Family members of patients with sepsis will also be impacted by the quality of sepsis education. They will be the ones who provide support and care to the patients and will need to be properly informed about sepsis to provide the best possible care.

3. Healthcare providers: Healthcare providers will be impacted by the quality of sepsis education because they will be the ones responsible for delivering the education to patients and family members. They need to be properly informed about sepsis to provide the best possible care.

4. Hospital administrators: Hospital administrators will be impacted by the quality of sepsis education because they are responsible for the quality of care provided by the hospital (McNab et al., 2018). They need to be properly informed about sepsis to ensure that the hospital is providing the best possible care.

5. Government officials: Government officials will be impacted by the quality of sepsis education because they are responsible for regulating the healthcare industry. They need to be properly informed about sepsis to ensure that the healthcare industry is providing the best possible care.

Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition caused by the body’s response to an infection. Sepsis, a condition that can trigger organ dysfunction, tissue destruction, and even death, can occasionally result from the body’s reaction to a disease. Sepsis must be diagnosed and treated quickly to improve patient survival (Afshar et al., 2019). Education is one method to enhance sepsis results. Education regarding the warning symptoms and indications of sepsis in addition to the significance of getting medical aid quickly is necessary for patients, families, and care givers. Additionally, healthcare providers need to be educated on the latest sepsis guidelines so that they can properly identify and treat sepsis. The quality improvement project of sepsis education will require a budget for resources such as educational materials, provider training, and patient outreach (De la Perrelle et al., 2020). Additionally, the project will require staff time to develop and implement the educational materials and programs. The goal of the sepsis education quality improvement project is to improve patient outcomes by increasing awareness of sepsis and its signs and symptoms, as well as increasing provider knowledge of the latest sepsis guidelines.

The action plan for the sepsis education quality improvement project includes firstly, developing educational materials for patients, families, and caregivers on the signs and symptoms of sepsis and the importance of seeking medical help early (Afshar et al., 2019). Develop and implement educational programs for healthcare providers on the latest sepsis guidelines. Increase awareness of sepsis among patients, families, caregivers, and healthcare providers (De la Perrelle et al., 2020). Evaluate the effectiveness of the sepsis education quality improvement project. The proposed implementation timeline for the project includes phase one which will take three months and would include developing educational materials. The second phase will take six months and will include the implementation of educational programs. The final phase in the implementation includes an evaluation of the project that will take up to nine months.


Afshar, M., Arain, E., Ye, C., Gilbert, E., Xie, M., Lee, J., Churpek, M. M., Durazo-Arvizu, R., Markossian, T., & Joyce, C. (2019). Patient Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of a Sepsis Care Quality Improvement Program in a Health System*.
Critical Care Medicine,
47(10), 1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000003919

De la Perrelle, L., Radisic, G., Cations, M., Kaambwa, B., Barbery, G., & Laver, K. (2020). Costs and economic evaluations of Quality Improvement Collaboratives in healthcare: a systematic review.
BMC Health Services Research,
20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4981-5

Hughes, M. C., Roedocker, A., Ehli, J., Walz, D., Froehlich, K., White, L., & Binder, B. (2019). A Quality Improvement Project to Improve Sepsis-Related Outcomes at an Integrated Healthcare System.
Journal for Healthcare Quality,
41(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000193

McNab, D., Freestone, J., Black, C., Carson-Stevens, A., & Bowie, P. (2018). Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method.
BMC Medicine,
16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1164-x



Quality Improvement Project – Sepsis

Student’s Name:

Course Name:

Institution Affiliation:

Identify the clinical issue that will be the focus of your Quality Improvement project.

The importance of undertaking and implementing quality improvement project in the healthcare environment cannot be understated. It would serve to boost the performance in a specific healthcare environment. Optimization of sepsis care is the first clinical issue that the quality improvement project would focus on. Sepsis is becoming a major health concern globally as there is high risk of death when one gets it. Specifically, delayed sepsis identification has been one of the biggest impediments to achieving desirable health outcomes among patients. However, integrating an analytical system as part of the quality improvement project will help in optimizing sepsis care. Specifically, this will involve early identification of sepsis through use of a robust data-driven approach. Developing this type of analytical system such as machine learning would help clinicians to have real-time actionable data that will then aid in boost early detection of sepsis (Klompas et al., 2020). Consequently, requisite health interventions would be implemented. On top of this, there would be rapid intervention concerning severe sepsis and this will help reduce mortality and improve health outcomes among patients. One of the most significant challenges when dealing with sepsis is that scientists have not been able to come up with an approved medicine that can help in targeting the impaired or aggressive immune system. For this reason, the need for clinicians to have access to high quality and robust analytical systems aimed at detecting sepsis would be crucial.

Provide rationale for the need to change the status quo.

Additionally, the current status quo with respect to sepsis is that there is lack of a robust analytical system aimed at detecting and identifying sepsis at an early stage. Globally, there is an ongoing debate especially in the healthcare industry regarding the exact timing of treatment for sepsis. In this perspective, incorporating a robust early detection and identification system for sepsis can be vital in boosting sepsis survival rates globally. Clinicians are the first line of care especially for patients who are at a critical stage of sepsis. There exist various reasons why there is need to shift from the status quo regarding sepsis and implement actionable, efficient and robust analytical frameworks for sepsis. First, it will aid in saving many lives of people affected by sepsis. The analytical system will aid in early detection, identification and diagnosis of sepsis by clinicians thus boosting survival rates and achieve desirable outcomes among patients. The cost of treating sepsis especially at later stages can be very high. Increased cost can make many patients shy away from accessing such care as they cannot afford it. However, early detection and diagnosis is not expensive and in this case, patients would achieve desirable outcomes within a short time (Kim & Park, 2019). Eventually, many lives of patients with sepsis will be saved thus positively impacting families, communities and nations.

Identify best practices from the literature related to the issues.

In this, increasing training especially for clinicians and nurses will go a long way in significantly improving sepsis recognition. Specifically, training them on how to use analytical frameworks for sepsis would be very crucial. Secondly, integrating a robust educational framework in sepsis ought to be leveraged by the global health industry to ensure high quality care and standardization. Specifically, the educational programmes anchored on sepsis would incorporate early identification, appropriate prescription and boosting care of patients (Rello & Rubulotta, 2018). Lastly, there is need for increased funding towards research anchored on sepsis to develop and implement high quality treatment plans for patients thus improving health outcomes in the long run.


Kim, H. I., & Park, S. (2019). Sepsis: Early recognition and optimized treatment. 
Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases
82(1), 6-14.

Klompas, M., Osborn, T. M., & Rhee, C. (2020). Who owns sepsis? 
Annals of internal medicine
172(3), 210-211.

Rello, & Rubulotta. (2018). Best practice for sepsis.
PubMed Central (PMC). 

Are you stuck with another assignment? Use our paper writing service to score better grades and meet your deadlines. We are here to help!

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper