Nursing care plan

If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality, and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. We are the ideal place for all your writing needs.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

choose like a reason why the child came into the unit and cite certain areas but the rest can just be typed and it doesn’t have to be cited because it is supposed to be like if you actually  saw the child yourself.

Clinical Judgement Plan

Instructor:

DATE Care Provided and UNIT:

Student Name

Clinical Judgement Plan

West Coast University

Professor Name

Date


Patient Information

(1)

Patient Initials:

Age & Gender:
Age in years/not DOB

Height/Weight:

Code Status:

Living Will/ DPOA:


Chief Complaint

Ex: SUBJECTIVE (Abnormal – Bullet Points)

What is the cause of the patients problem now describing i.e., Pt is having SOB 8/10 with exertion?


Admitting Diagnosis & Admission Date


History of Present Illness (HPI)

WHAT BROUGHT THE PT TO THE HOSPITAL? WHAT EVENTS LEAD UP TO THIS? WHAT HAPPENED WHEN THEY GOT TO THE HOSPITAL- UNTIL NOW WHEN YOU ARE PROVIDING CARE? (USE SEPARATE ATTACHED WORD DOC WHEN NEEDED) (SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)



Medical History: (SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)

PAST DIAGNOSED MEDICAL PROBLEMS

For each disease identified, define, it, describe pathophysiology, and cite source


Surgical History: (SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)

PAST DIAGNOSED SURGICAL PROBLEMS

For each procedure identified, define & describe it; include year of procedure & cite source


Social History:

SMOKING/ CIGARETTE/ TOBACCO/ E-CIGARETTE /MARIJUANA USE
ALCOHOL/ ELICIT DRUG USE


Cultural considerations, ethnicity, occupation, religion, family support, insurance. (1) (14) Socioeconomic/Cultural/Spiritual Orientation & Psychosocial Considerations/Concerns: include the following Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) (SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)

❋Economic Stability

❋ Education

❋Social and Community Context

❋ Health and Health Care

❋ Neighborhood and Built Environment


Erickson’s Developmental Stage Related to pt. & Cite References (1) *
List and Discuss specific stage (based on objective assessment)

(SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)




TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:

Pathophysiology of Primary Medical Dx (reason for hospitalization) Support with Evidence Based Citations

Pathophysiology of Primary Medical Dx (reason for

Ex: The primary pathophysiologic process in COPD is persistent but variable inflammation of the airways

(SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)

hospitalization)

TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:

(SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)


Patient Education (In Pt.) for Referrals/ Discharge Planning

REFERRALS NEEDED/CASE Management

ASSESS LEARNING STYLE:

LEARNING PREFERENCE: WRITTEN, VIDEO, etc.

LEARNING BARRIER(S): LANGUAGE, EDUCATION LEVEL

ASSISTIVE DEVICES: GLASSES, HEARING AIDES, etc.


Medical Management and Collaborative Plan


(From MD, PT, OT notes…. etc.) *Consider past 24 – 48 hours

(SEE RUBRIC REQUIREMENTS
)


ANTICIPATED TRANSFER/ DISCHARGE PLANNING:

DISCUSS: PRIORITY GOALS TO BE ACHIEVED to TRANSFER or DISCHARGE

EQUIPMENT

MEDS

TREATMENT

TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:


Include Relevant Diagnostic Procedures/Results & Pertinent Lab tests/ Values


(With normal ranges), include dates and rationales supported with Evidence Based Citations


Include 2-3 nursing interventions for abnormal labs and for all diagnostic procedures




Lab Tests or

Diagnostic Scan

Normal Ranges

Admission Lab Values

Current Lab Values

Explain Abnormal Labs
R/T Your Pt & NI

(USE SEPARATE ATTACHED WORD DOC WHEN NEEDED)

TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:


INCLUDE: Appropriate Diagnostic Tests/ Procedures- DATEs and RESULTS

(Can add See attached Word Doc)

TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:


Medications & Allergies (2)

Medication Name

Include BOTH Generic AND Trade names for RX; include OTC, herbal (non-pharmacological items)

Dose

Route

Freq.

NOTE: PRN ‘alone’ ≠ Freq

Indications

(PRN meds must include
MD ordered Indication)

Mechanism of Action

Side Effects/

Adverse Reactions

Nursing Considerations specific to this patient with citations

What cues will you observe for?

What will you monitor (labs, vitals, etc?)


ASSESSMENT/History of Present Illness /REVIEW OF SYTEMS


TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:

Physical Assessment Findings including presenting signs and symptoms that you will complete for this patient supported with
Evidence Based Citations


MISC:


Integumentary (12)


Psychosocial (14)


Endocrine (13)


Vital Signs (4)

BP:

HR: (Rhythm)

RR:

Temp:

O2 (any supplemental)

Pain (0/10)

Ht (cm)

Wt. (Kg)

BMI:


Respiratory (7)


Cardiovascular (6)


Neurological (5)


GI/Hydration/Nutrition (9)


GU (10)


Musculoskeletal (8)


Rest/ Exercise (11)






TIME OUT!!! Student instructions:

To be sure your clinical judgement statements written below are accurate. You need to review the defining characteristics and related factors associated with and see how your patient data match. Do you have an accurate match or are additional data required, or does another cue from abnormal assessment findings need to be investigated?


Take Action

Sorts the actions (based on their evaluation in various dimensions) and carries out the action(s) to address the hypothesis/hypotheses with highest priority first.


Prioritize Hypotheses

Evaluates the probable client needs/concerns and problems generated previously in various dimensions and organize them into an ordered list where the priority hypotheses are on the top. (ABCs, Maslow, safety, acute v chronic, unstable v stable, urgent v non-urgent)

Reflecting

Evaluate


Recognize Cues

Obtain information from different sources (e.g., the environment, the pt., the family, another nurse, EHR) in different formats (e.g., visual observation, audio perception, lab results, text description, etc.).


Evaluation

Compare and contrast what happened with your plan of care against what was expected/anticipated (disease progression, unique client response) and decide whether additional clinical decisions are needed.


Clinical Judgement (The expected/anticipated outcomes or SMART GOALS)

These should be written in a SMART format for patient goals.

For examples:

The patient will have decreased pain by verbalizing pain score 3/10 or below by the end of the shift.

The patient will maintain clear airway by effectively coughing by the end of the shift.


Generate Solutions

Develops a list of actions to address the hypotheses. Give rationales for each solution.

Responding

Interpreting

Observation

Implement

Planning

Analysis

Assessment


Analyze Cues

Interprets cues from their existing knowledge base and nursing perspective, evaluate cues in terms of relevancy, importance, and interrelationship among other cues, organize cues in the mental representation of the scenario (e.g., organize cues in clusters), and then develops a group of probable client needs/concerns and problems

References

Use APA format and hanging indents for all references.

If you have any questions, please consult the APA 7th Edition.

SK/DW 2/22 pg. 1

Final Version 3/10/22 DW/ss & MS Team

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment & History of Present Illness

Recognizing cues focused on observation

4 pts

Proficient

HPI explains in detail with accurate and in- depth understanding of chief complaint and supported by evidence-based citations.

3.04 pts

Acceptable

HPI explains in some detail with moderate understanding of chief complaint or no support from evidence-based citations.

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

HPI explains in limited detail with insufficient understanding of chief complaint or support from evidence-based citations.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

HPI details limited with poor understanding of chief complaint and no evidence-based citations to support.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognizing assessment parameters

Clinical thinking and assessment cues

8 pts

Proficient

Identifies the 4 imperative assessment cues and or medical diagnoses supported by evidence-based citations.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Identifies 2 imperative assessment cues and or medical diagnosis supported by evidence-based citations.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Identifies 1 imperative assessment cues and or medical diagnosis, vaguely supported by evidence-based citation.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Unable to identify any imperative assessments parameters relevant to medical diagnosis and without supported evidence-based citation.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpreting diagnostic criteria & diagnostic tests and procedures

Clinical reasoning and analysis of cues

4 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately describes the client’s diagnostic criteria which clearly supports the chief complaints and presenting signs/symptoms.

3.04 pts

Acceptable

Adequately describes the client’s diagnostic criteria which adequately supports the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely describes the client’s diagnostic criteria which vaguely supports the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Lack description of the client’s diagnostic criteria that does not support the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePast medical & surgical history, pathophysiology

Clinical judgment and recognizing cues

8 pts

Proficient

Past medical/surgical history detailed with full explanation of pathophysiology for admitting diagnosis and for each diagnosis & accurate detail with specific detail related to the client’s history and symptoms and supported by evidence-based citations.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Past medical/surgical history given with partial explanation of identified admitting diagnosis and preexisting medical diagnoses, intermittent details related to the client’s history and symptoms, or not completely supported by evidence-based citations.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Past medical/surgical history given with minimal explanation of identified admitting diagnosis and preexisting medical diagnoses; few to no details related to the client’s history and symptoms; or not supported by evidence-based citations.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No past medical/surgical history given or given without explanation; no admitting diagnosis and or pre-existing medical diagnosis identified or explanations inaccurate and not related to the client’s history and symptoms without evidence.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocioeconomic/psychosocial assessment

The impact of socioeconomic and cultural background

8 pts

Proficient

Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in complete detail with references; identified 3 or more psychosocial concerns.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Describes socioeconomic and cultural background with limited detail without references; identified 1-2 psychosocial concern.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in vague detail without references; identified 1 psychosocial concern.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Describes socioeconomic and cultural background with no detail without references; identified no psychosocial concerns.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterprofessional consults & discharge referrals

Generating outcome data for plans

4 pts

Proficient

Lists 2-3 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns; rationale demonstrated satisfactory understanding of consults and interventions.

3.04 pts

Acceptable

Lists 1-2 appropriate collaborative issue/concern Rationale and demonstrated limited understanding of consults and interventions.

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

Lists 1 appropriate collaborative issue/concern Rationale and demonstrated vague understanding of consults and interventions.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Lists inappropriate collaborative issues/concerns; rationale demonstrated unsatisfactory understanding of consults and intervention

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk assessment

Interpreting risk data analyses of cues

4 pts

Proficient

The goal clearly supports the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and timed. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative interventions.

3.04 pts

Acceptable

The goal somewhat supports the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are somewhat measurable and realistic, and timed. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative interventions.

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

The goals are inconsistent with the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are vaguely realistic, measure and timed. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative intervention.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

The goals lack support and nonspecific from gathered data, Outcome criteria are not specific, realistic, measurable, attainable, nor timed. Does not evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative intervention.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMultidisciplinary Client Outcome & Discharge Planning

Analysis of teamwork and collaborative cues; analysis of collaboration with discharge planning

4 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately describes concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.

3.04 pts

Acceptable

Adequately describes concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely describes concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to describe concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeaching assessment & client education

Responding and implementation; responding to identified client educational needs.

8 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately identifies areas of instructional needs, learning preference, and learning barriers. Provided clear and concise client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Adequately identifies areas of instructional needs, learning preference and learning barriers. Provided some and adequate client education that aids in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely identifies areas of instructional needs, learning preference and learning barriers. Provided minimal and vague client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to identify areas of instructional needs, learning preference and learning barriers. Did not provide client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePertinent lab test & abnormal involuntary movement

Interpreting data for analyses of cues

4 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately identifies pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to a client’s disease process

3.04 pts

Acceptable

Adequately identifies pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to the client’s disease process.

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely identifies pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to the client’s disease process.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to identify pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to the client’s disease process.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing clinical judgments

Interpreting data for prioritizing hypotheses; this criterion is linked to a clinical outcome: nursing clinical judgment.

8 pts

Proficient

The 4 nursing clinical judgements are accurate and prioritized with clear etiology and data to support rationale. The clinical decision is consistent and presents correlation from the assessment data based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

The 4 nursing clinical Judgments are adequate and prioritized with sufficient etiology and data to support rational. The nursing clinical decision is adequate and presents correlation from assessment data based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

The 4 clinical judgments are vague and not prioritized with vague etiology and unclear correlation from the assessment data that may or may not be classified based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No clinical judgment is listed and or are based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing clinical goals

Evaluation of nursing clinical judgment; clinical thinking + clinical reasoning = clinical judgment

8 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately establishes client’s outcome criteria and can be achieved with nursing assistance. The goal clearly supports the clinical decisions and plan of care. The goals are easily measurable and realistic.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Adequately establishes client’s outcome criteria and can be achieved with nursing assistance. The goal somewhat supports the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are somewhat measurable and realistic.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely establishes client’s outcome criteria and may or may not be achieved with nursing assistance. The goals are inconsistent with the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are vaguely realistic and measurable.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to establish client’s outcome criteria that cannot be met by nursing assistance. The goals lack support and nonspecific from gathered data, Outcome criteria are not realistic and not measurable.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing interventions criteria & rationale

Interpret planning to generate solutions

8 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately Identifies independent nursing interventions criteria with teaching supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice. Interventions are always individualized, prioritized, organized, specific and realistic. Nursing actions are always aimed at the client’s goals and directed at the stated health deviation based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Adequately Identifies nursing interventions with adequate teaching. Scientific rationale is adequately supported by evidence-based practice. Interventions are adequate, individualized, organized, specific and realistic. Interventions can be implemented adequately that is focused on client’s goal and health deviation based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely Identifies nursing interventions with unclear teaching. Scientific rationale is vaguely relevant & not supported by evidence-based practice. Interventions are inconsistent, non-specific, disorganized, and not adequately focused on the client’s goal. Interventions are difficult to implement and has weak relationship to nursing diagnosis based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to identify interventions and teaching. Lack Scientific rationale and is not supported by evidence-based practice. Interventions are non-specific, inappropriate, unrealistic, un-measurable and do not relate to nursing diagnosis. Intervention does do not focus on client goals and/or the stated health deviation based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation

8 pts

Proficient

Skillfully and independently identifies criteria for evaluation. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measure’s goal completion. Modifies, revises, and recommends alternative intervention.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Adequately identifies criteria for evaluation. Adequately determines effectiveness of nursing interventions and measure’s goal completion with appropriate modification and revisions to the treatment plan.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Difficulty utilizing criteria for evaluation. Difficulty determining effectiveness of interventions and goal completion. Evaluation vaguely supports if goal is met or not met with inaccurate revisions to the treatment plan.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not support nor utilize criteria for evaluation. Does not determine effectiveness of interventions and goal completion. There is a lack of alternative interventions to the treatment plan.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications

8 pts

Proficient

Clearly and accurately identifies all components of the medication list, including mechanism of action, purpose, range, side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.

6.08 pts

Acceptable

Adequately identifies components of the medication list. Adequate description of mechanism of action, purpose, range, side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.

4.8 pts

Needs Improvement

Vaguely identifies components of the medication list. Lack description of mechanism of action, purpose, range side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to identify components of the medication list. Failed to include mechanism of action, purpose, range side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Organization

4 pts

Proficient

Accurate APA format, appropriate citations, and references, No spelling or grammar errors.

3.04 pts

Acceptable

Adequate APA format. Minimal citations and references are appropriate. Few spellings or grammar errors.

2.4 pts

Needs Improvement

Numerous APA format errors, Inaccurate citations, and references. Few spelling and grammar errors.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Fails to utilize APA format. No citations or references included numerous spelling and grammar errors.

4 pts

Total Points: 100

Are you stuck with another assignment? Use our paper writing service to score better grades and meet your deadlines. We are here to help!


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net