Innovation plan
If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality, and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. We are the ideal place for all your writing needs.
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
Create an innovation plan proposal using the attached “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Template.”
A. Introduce your innovation proposal by doing the following:
1. Explain the role of an innovative nurse leader.
2. Summarize the community of practice (CoP) established during your CPE, including the following points:
a. organizational characteristics, services provided, and size of the service area
b. demographic characteristics of the population served
c. team member roles—formal and informal
d. shared team values
3. Focusing on the organization identified in your CPE, discuss the internal and external factors that prompted this proposal.
4. Assess how your proposed innovation aligns to other professional, regulatory, and/or governmental strategic initiatives.
5. Construct a purpose statement for your proposed innovation.
6. Create a goal of the proposed innovation in SMART+C format (i.e., Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timed, and Challenging).
B. Complete a review of relevant sources by doing the following:
1. Identify five scholarly peer-reviewed sources published within the last five years that are relevant to your innovation proposal.
2. Complete the Relevant Sources Summary Table in the attached “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Template.””
3. Identify the evidence strength and the hierarchy of each source, as outlined in the attached “WGU Levels of Evidence” document.
NOTE: Use the WGU Evidence Leveling Navigation Tool in the Supporting Documents to identify the evidence strength and hierarchy for each source.
4. Synthesize your findings by identifying patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature as they relate to the proposed innovation.
5. Develop recommendations for the proposed innovation based on the literature.
C. Discuss the data-collection methods and technology used to identify and support the proposed innovation by doing the following:
1. Explain the process you used to generate ideas for an innovation from the CoP.
2. Provide examples of big and small data within your current healthcare setting.
3. Discuss how big data could be used to support the proposed innovation.
4. Describe technology enhancements required for the proposed innovation.
NOTE: A technology enhancement could be the development of a new technology or enhanced application of an existing technology.
D. Discuss how to support interprofessional collaboration in the midst of disruptive innovation by doing the following:
1. Analyze how disruption from the proposed innovation could impact individuals, processes, and organizations.
2. Develop strategies to mitigate the challenges of disruption for individuals, processes, and organizations.
3. Discuss how the proposed innovation can leverage benefits of disruptive innovation for cost-effective, quality healthcare outcomes.
E. Discuss your pre-implementation plan by doing the following:
1. Discuss diffusion of innovation as it relates to the implementation of your plan.
NOTE: Refer to the COS for Roger’s Theory.
2. Identify the roles and responsibilities of team members needed to implement your proposal using the Innovation Action Plan table in the attached “Evidence-Based Innovation Plan Template” including information that is practical, accurate, and relevant to the proposed innovation. ”
3. Discuss the financial implications of implementing the proposed innovation.
4. Develop an interprofessional communication plan accounting for the logistics (i.e., the who, what, when, and where) of facilitating the innovation and its usability.
5. Discuss how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed innovation.
F. Conclude your innovation proposal by doing the following:
1. Reiterate the purpose and rationale for your proposed innovation.
2. Reflect on your experience identifying an innovation for your setting.
3. Discuss the strengths and challenges of the process used for developing this innovation plan.
4. Discuss how you will apply what you have learned for future initiatives.
|
||
Strength of Evidence |
Evidence Hierarchy |
Types of Studies |
Level I |
· · · · |
· Meta-analyses · Systematic Reviews · Integrative Reviews · National Practice Guidelines |
This level includes research designs of Meta-Analyses, Systematic Reviews, Integrative Reviews, National Practice Guidelines (Evidence-based practice guidelines housed in national repositories that were developed from systematic reviews). |
||
Level II |
· · |
· Randomized Controlled Trials · Experimental studies |
This level represents evidence from studies using a true experimental design. |
||
Level III |
· |
· Quasi-experimental studies (experiments without randomization) |
This level represents evidence obtained from experimental studies without randomization. |
||
Level IV |
· |
· Retrospective · Case control · Cross-sectional · Cohort-comparison · Prospective · Descriptive · Correlational single studies |
This level represents evidence from well-designed non-experimental studies such as retrospective, case-control, cross-sectional, cohort comparison, prospective, descriptive, and correlational single studies. |
||
Level V |
· |
· Meta-syntheses |
This level represents evidence from systematic reviews of studies using qualitative methods. |
||
Level VI |
· |
· Qualitative studies |
This level represents single studies using a qualitative research method. |
||
Level VII |
· |
· Narrative Reviews · Quality Improvement Projects · Case Studies · Reports from expert committees · Opinions from experts · Specialist opinions · Editorials · Scoping Reviews |
This level represents a variety of non-research-based evidence and generally includes reports from expert committees and/or opinions of authorities on the subject. The evidence in this level includes specialists’ opinions, case studies, practice guidelines, narrative reviews, editorials, regulations, legislation, program outcome data, quality improvement projects, and scoping reviews. |
For additional information refer to D031: Advancing Evidence-Based Innovation in Nursing Practice Course of Study, Unit 3. –
Revised Oct2021
Is it Research?
YES NO, choose Level VII,
Expert Opinion
Is it a Single Study or
some type of review?
Single Study
Is it
Quantitative?
YES, it is Quantitative
Is it some type of
Experimental Study?
Experimental vs.
Non-experimental
YES, it is Experimental
Does it have the 3
Hallmarks? Random Sample,
Control Group & Intervention
Group present?
YES, choose Level II,
RCT, True Experimental
NO, choose Level III,
Quasi-experimental
Choose Level VI,
Qualitative
Review
Is it Level I or a Level V?
WORDS IN BLUE FONT ARE ACTIVE HYPERLINKS TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
IMPORTANT: DO NOT PRINT
D031 Resource_Updated April2022
NO, choose Level IV,
Non-experimental
NO, it is
Qualitative
WGU Evidence Leveling
Navigation Tool
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
D031- Advancing Evidence-Based Innovation in Nursing Practice Task Tips
Task Aspect Rubric Criteria – Competent Comments & Tips
A1.
Explanation of
Role
The explanation of the
innovative nurse leader role
contains accurate
characteristics of the nurse
innovator and behaviors of
innovation leadership. The
explanation is well-supported
by a scholarly reference and
includes examples relevant to
the role.
This section must include at least one reference citation from a peer-reviewed Evidence-
Based book or article.
PA task must include at least one reference citation from a peer-reviewed Evidence-
Based book or article.
Role of Nurse Innovator Resources:
▪ Cianelli, R., Clipper, B., Freeman, R., Goldstein, J., & Wyatt, T. H. (2016). The
innovation road map: A guide for nurse leaders.
https://www.nursingworld.org/globalassets/ana/innovations-roadmap-english.pdf
▪ Cusson, R. M., Meehan, C., Bourgault, A., & Kelley, T. (2020). Educating the next
generation of nurses to be innovators and change agents. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 36(2), 13-19.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S8755722319301176
▪ Weberg, D., Davidson, S., Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2019). Leadership
for evidence-based innovation in nursing and health professions. Jones & Bartlett
Publishers. P. 13.
▪ (Weberg et al., 2019, Chapter 2, Innovative Leadership Behaviors)
https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284118100/cfi/6/22!/4/2/[email protected]:0.00
COS Unit 3
STARTING TIPS: Remember to remove template original text as you complete each section.
Paste the task instruction points into each section of the template where they best fit. Then
remove as you write about each rubric point.
A2a.
Organizational
Characteristics
The summary includes an
accurate description of
organizational characteristics of
the CoP, including type, setting,
and structure. The summary
accurately describes the
services provided and size of
the service area and offers in-
When describing the Community of Practice [CoP] cite references including the website of
the organization. If you use data from different areas of the organization’s website review
the rules for citing websites with the same name and date “APA Twins.” Organizational
structure includes the leaders of the facility possibly from an organizational chart. You’ll
want to include a description of the organizational structure – who reports to whom – the
“pecking order” so to speak. See if you can get a copy of an organizational chart for your
facility – that will give you a lot of good information – then write it up as a narrative – don’t
just insert the chart into your paper.
Task Aspect Rubric Criteria – Competent Comments & Tips
depth details about the services
provided.
Organizational structure includes the leaders of the facility possibly from an organizational
chart.
Organizational Structure Resources:
https://www.heflo.com/blog/business-management/small-business-organizational-
structure-examples/
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/operations-executive-job-descriptions-808.html
A2b.
Demographics
The summary of the
demographic characteristics of
the population served is
effectively supported with
quantitative and qualitative
data. The characteristics
described are plausible and
appropriate to the population
served.
They’ll want to see the specific demographic data/breakdown (by age and ethnicity etc. that
you will obtain from the US census bureau). This section must include both quantitative
(percentage of) and qualitative (age/gender/ethnicity) data. Cite references for this
information such as https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/
or http://census.gov
A2c. Team
Member Roles
The team members are
accurately identified and their
respective roles are relevant to
the proposed change. The
summary encompass informal
and formal roles.
List each team member as well as both the formal and informal roles. Formal roles could
include the team member’s job description. Informal roles are activities that are performed
but are not a part of the person’s job description. Include yourself on the team!
Swensen S., Pugh M., McMullan C., Kabcenell A. (2013). High-impact leadership: Improve
care, improve the health of populations, and reduce costs. [IHI White Paper]. Please note: In
order to download this whitepaper, IHI.org asks that you create a free account, then the PDF
will download to your computer.
Eggenberger et al. (2014). Creating high-performance interprofessional teams. Retrieved
from
https://www.americannursetoday.com/creating-high-performance-interprofessional-
teams/
Task Aspect Rubric Criteria – Competent Comments & Tips
Brickman, J. (2016). How to get health care employees onboard with change. Harvard
Business Review. Retrieved from
https://hbr.org/2016/11/how-to-get-health-care-employees-onboard-with-change
COS Unit 3 Module One; Topics 1 and 2; Unit 5, Module 1, Topic 3
A2d. Shared
Team Values
A summary is provided of the
shared goals of the organization
and the team. The discussion is
supported by real examples.
Provide specific examples of shared team member goals and values that drew the
team together to create this innovation. Connect the shared team values with a specific
mission or vision from the organization [CoP].
Weberg, D., Davidson, S., Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2019). Leadership for evidence-
based innovation in nursing and health professions. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Weberg et al., (2019). Chapter 2, p. 29-
30 https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284118100/cfi/6/20!/4/190/2/[email protected]:18.3
A3. Discussion
of Internal
and External
Factors
The submission discusses
internal and external factors
that prompted the innovation
proposal, and the factors
discussed are plausible.
Include internal and external factors that prompted this proposal by the CoP. The discussion
must be grounded in evidence [cite references]. Include internal and external factors that
prompted this proposal by the innovation team. Internal and external factors could be
either positive or negative that led to the need for this innovation.
Weberg et al., (2019). Chapter 1, p. 26
You are essentially being asked to analyze the health care organization that you are
examining (the CoP) and for which you are proposing an innovation ….you might want to
perform something called a SWOT Analysis.
Evaluate the Community of Practice ( CoP)
SWOT Analysis is a method used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and
Threats that exist in the area in which the CoP functions. In this context, it is used to assess
the environment in which the CoP functions as well as resources and needs that add to the
picture. SWOT analysis uses both internal and external factors that may impact the CoP.
Internal factors, including strengths and weaknesses, reside within the CoP and its members,
while external factors, opportunities and threats, are external to the CoP. Once these critical
Task Aspect Rubric Criteria – Competent Comments & Tips
factors are identified, they are used to create the goals that members of your CoP would like
to achieve.
SWOT Analysis
Strengths: internal positive attributes of the CoP that can facilitate activities
Weaknesses: internal attributes of the CoP that may hinder achievement of its activities and
goals
Opportunities: external conditions that may facilitate activities of the CoP
Threats: external conditions that may stand in the way of CoP activities
A4. Alignment
to Strategic
Initiatives
The assessment of the
alignment of the proposed
innovation with other
professional, regulatory, or
governmental strategic
initiatives is accurate and
relevant to the proposed
innovation.
Strategic initiatives are the means through which an organization translates its goals and
visions into practice. This material will come from the student’s outside research.
Cite references within the body of the paper and reference list.
This may include personal communication, if applicable. Personal communication is only
cited in the body of the paper, not in the reference list.
Professional, regulatory, or governmental strategic initiatives include CDC, Healthy People
2020, Joint Commission, Professional Organizations like nurse practitioner organizations,
ANCC, etc.
A5. Purpose
Statement
The purpose statement is clear,
relevant to the proposal,
meaningful, applicable, realistic,
and specific. It is clear how the
purpose statement supports
the success of the proposed
innovation.
Include one statement that describes the overall direction or focus for the proposed
innovation. For example The [ “purpose,” “intent,” or “objective”] of this proposed
innovation is to [“Improve,” “expand,””increase”]____.
Task Aspect Rubric Criteria – Competent Comments & Tips
A6. Innovation
Goal
The goal statement for the
innovation uses the SMART+C
format and is relevant to the
proposed innovation.
The SMART-C goal is more specific and measurable than a purpose statement [A5].
SMART-C [Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-bound, and Challenging].
Challenging =They stretch the group to set its aims on significant improvements that are
important to members of the community.
B1. Scholarly
Sources
5 sources from
scholarly peer-
reviewed journals
are accurately
identified and were
published within the
past 5 years. All of
them are relevant to
the proposed
innovation.
Prior to writing this section, search the WGU library and Internet to identify credible sources that
contain relevant information on your innovation topic. Select the top five sources that are most
relevant to your innovation plan.
In this section, you will present the results of your search by completing the Relevant Sources
Summary Table, which will list key findings from your sources.
https://ininet.org/goal-setting-the-smartc-way.html
https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/structure/strategic-planning/create-objectives/main
B2. Presentations
of Findings
The Relevant
Sources Summary
Table is complete
and includes a
detailed summary of
each source
identified in part B1.
Each summary is
appropriately
related to the
proposed
innovation.
In this section, you will present the results of your search by completing the Relevant Sources
Summary Table, which will list key findings from your sources in correct APA formatting. Describe
in detail specific aspects of the study or article.
B3. Evidence
Strength and
Hierarchy
The evidence
strength and
evidence hierarchy
of each chosen
source in the
evidence critique
table is accurately
identified, using the
Strength of Evidence
information in the
study plan.
List the level of evidence in the Relevant Sources Summary Table. Follow Levels of Evidence document in
COS. List the level of evidence in the Relevant Sources Summary Table. Follow the WGU Levels of Evidence
document located under “Assessments” under the “Supporting Documents” tab in the course of study.
You do not have to name the exact hierarchy category, just the general title.
Level I: Meta-analysis, Systematic Reviews, Integrative Reviews, National Practice Guidelines
Level II: Randomized Controlled Trial and Experimental
Level IV: Nonexperimental
Level V
Level VI
Level VII
Here is an example of how to level an experimental research article (level II) below:
(Note – you are not required to include a level 2 article – this is just an example to show you how to set it
up)
Table 1.
Relevant Sources Summary Table
Reference Citation Relevant Findings
Level of
Evidence
Hierarchy
Downey, C., Randell, R., Brown, J., &
Jayne, D. G. (2018). Continuous versus
intermittent vital signs monitoring using a
wearable, wireless patch in patients
admitted to surgical wards: Pilot cluster
randomized controlled trial. Journal of
Medical Internet Research, 20(12),
e10802. https://doi.org/10.2196/10802
There were 226
patients in this trial,
140 were
randomized to
continuous remote
monitoring and 86 to
intermittent
monitoring alone.
Continuous
monitoring was
provided by a
wireless patch, worn
on the patient’s
chest, with data
transmitted
wirelessly every 2
minutes to a central
monitoring station or
a mobile device
carried by the
patient’s nurse. On
average, patients
receiving continuous
monitoring were
administered
antibiotics faster
Level II Randomized
controlled
trial (RCT)
after evidence of
sepsis had a shorter
average length of
hospital stay and
were less likely to
require readmission
within 30 days of
discharge.
B4. Synthesis of
Literature
The synthesis of the
findings from the
sources in part B1 is
specific to the
proposed innovation
and logically
presented. It
accurately identifies
and synthesizes
patterns, trends, and
gaps in the
literature.
Compare and contrast the information from the five sources. Sources may have used similar
methods to one another or had findings that were inconsistent with the other sources. Be sure to
cover patterns, trends and gaps or explain if no gaps in the literature exist.
Seek the common points or themes, Describe the interventions in the articles.
COS p 29 unit 3 HAS AN EXAMPLE OF SYNTHESIS.
B5.
Recommendations
The developed
recommendations
incorporate the
summary findings
from the literature,
and are appropriate
for the proposed
innovation. The
recommendations
are clear, specific,
Make recommendations based on the literature. The recommendation should reflect the need
for the innovation, based on literature synthesis and what was found in the literature. How will the
student proceed with the innovation based on the literature findings?
and logical.
C1. Idea
Generation
Process
The explanation is
comprehensive and
includes specific
details about the
process used to
generate ideas from
the CoP. The
explanation is
relevant to the
proposed
innovation.
Discuss in detail the process you used during your clinical practice experience (CPE) to identify the
innovative idea.
Discuss consensus decision making process used during CPE to identify the innovative idea. Be
specific. [You can copy and paste some information from CPE Phase 2].
a. https://www.lmpartnership.org/tools/interest-based-problem-solving-and-consensus-decision-
making then click pdf
b. D031 COS p. 19, Kea, B., & Sun, B. (2015). Consensus development for healthcare professionals.
Intern Emergency Medicine, 10(3), 373–383.
c. https://www.movetoamend.org/consensus-decision-making
d. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212017313002090
e. https://www.consensusdecisionmaking.org/
C2. Data Examples The examples of big
and small data
provided are
practical and
relevant to the
current healthcare
setting. Key
examples are
provided, or their
absence is
reasonably justified.
Be sure to describe examples of the use of both big and small data in the facility where innovation
will occur. The big and small data do not have to relate to the innovation. In contrast to big data,
small data is a data set of very specific attributes that can be created by analyzing larger sets of
data.
*You can go back and review the PA Task FAQs recorded cohort for help on this aspect
*Small data is data in a volume and format that makes it accessible, informative and actionable.
… Big data is often said to be characterized by 3Vs: the volume of data, the variety of types
of data and the velocity at which it is processed, all of which combine to make big data very difficult
to manage.
Here is a link to an article that outlines the difference between the two as well as the importance of
both in the health care setting…
https://blog.trigent.com/the-importance-of-small-data-vs-big-data-for-
healthcare/#:~:text=Small%20data%20helps%20them%20by,a%20certain%20period%20of%20time.
C3. Big Data
Support
The discussion
demonstrates an
accurate
understanding of
how big data can be
used to support the
proposed
innovation.
Compare the current situation with the projected outcomes using data. Health plans can also
leverage data to be more predictive and proactive in outreach to at-risk members. Big Data
initiatives may uncover potential risks in certain members based on the analysis of aggregated
behavior, demographic, and claim data. Payers can then offer preventative information.
• Weberg, D., Davidson, S., Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2019). Leadership for evidence-
based innovation in nursing and health professions. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Chapter
8, P. 245. https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284118100/cfi/6/36!/4/50/[email protected]:86.5
C4. Technology
Enhancements
The described
technology
enhancements are
specific, appropriate,
and feasible for the
proposed
innovation. The
description includes
details about the
proposed innovation
and a plausible
justification for the
identified
enhancements.
Write about any necessary improvements to the existing technology.
Does there need to be new or upgraded technology to successfully launch the innovation, such as
software or hardware?
D1. Disruption The analysis
demonstrates an
accurate and in-
depth understanding
of disruption
relevant to the
proposed innovation
This section is to be ‘in-depth,’ so include substantial details. Cover all three areas: individuals,
processes, and organizations
This section is to be ‘in-depth,’ so include substantial details. Cover all three areas: individuals,
processes, and organizations. P. 54 of COS.
and clearly identifies
its potential impact
on individuals,
processes, and
organizations.
One of the roles of an innovative leader is to be a disruptor. If there is an idea that is worth trying,
disruptors push to test the implementation of the idea, even if it means treading into new
territories. By the way – disruption is not meant to be a bad thing…Think of it this way, WGU has
‘disrupted’ how people access higher education in that learners no longer need to attend a brick
and mortar institution and learners don’t need to be confined by rigid time schedules. Has there
been resistance to this notion across the board? Sure – but sometimes we need to shake things up,
right?
The view that we have never done it that way before is not a reason to shelve a new
idea. Weberg et al. (2019), Chapter 6, p.
179 https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284118100/cfi/6/32!/4/102/[email protected]:21.5
Boehmer, K., Shippee, N., Beebe, T., & Montori, V. (2016). Pursuing minimally disruptive medicine:
Disruption from illness and health care-related demands is correlated with patient capacity. Journal
of Clinical Epidemiology, 74, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.006
Christensen, C., Raynor, M., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business
Review, 93(12), 44-53. Retrieved from http://pedrotrillo.com/wp-
content/uploads/2016/01/Whatisdisruptiveinnovation.pdf
D2. Strategies to
Mitigate
Challenges
The developed
strategies are
specific and feasible
to mitigate the
challenges of
disruption for
individuals,
processes, and
organizations.
List how to address any problems or resistance that you may encounter as a result of launching this
innovation. Focus on the positive effect of the disruption. List how the challenges
disrupt individuals, processes and organizations.
D3. Leverage
Benefits of
Disruptive
Innovation
The discussion
includes a practical
and plausible
explanation of how
the proposed
innovation can
leverage benefits of
Write about the ways that you can maximize the benefits of the disruptive innovation. Cover all
required areas related to cost-effective, quality healthcare outcomes. As an example, if a patient
education program via IPad saves a nurse time, this is a benefit to be leveraged.
disruptive
innovation relevant
to identified cost-
effective, quality
healthcare
outcomes.
E1. Diffusion of
Innovation
The discussion
demonstrates a
comprehensive and
accurate
understanding of
diffusion of
innovation and
appropriately relates
relevant information
to the proposed
innovation
implementation
plan.
Define Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation theory and explain how this could unfold as the proposed
innovation is applied at the target facility. You should not only focus on the levels of adopters but
also how people decide to adopt or reject an innovation.
Pg. 63 D031 COS. Kaminski, J. (2011). Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing
Informatics, 6(2). Retrieved from http://cjni.net/journal/?p=1444
Dearing, J. W. & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health
Affairs, 37(2),183-190. www.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104
You may use some information from CPE Phase 3 here.
*Please see the Roger’s Theory of Diffusion of Innovation recorded cohort*
E2. Innovation
Action Plan Table
The Innovation
Action Plan is
submitted using the
template provided in
the task directions.
The information in
the table is practical,
accurate, and
relevant to the
proposed
innovation.
Include all details listed in the table. This section may contain some information from section A2c.
This information can come directly from CPE Phase 3 here.
These could be the same team members from the original CPE innovation team but it could
include other relevant members.
E3. Financial
Implications
The discussion
includes thorough
consideration of the
financial implications
for all stages of the
implementation for
the proposed
innovation. The
discussion is
supported by
specific, relevant,
and accurate details,
and it is meaningful
to the planning
process.
Review the costs that could occur during all stages of implementation [Planning, Implementation,
Evaluation phases] including materials, salaries, training, IT specialist hours or design of a
program, etc. If the innovation will save money or increase reimbursement, students may discuss
that as well.
E4.
Interprofessional
Communication
Plan
The communication
plan considers all
logistical
components of
facilitating the
innovation and its
usability including
but not limited to
who will give and
receive
communication,
what will be
communicated, and
when and where the
message will be
communicated. The
discussion is specific
and relevant to the
proposed
innovation.
Include all aspects of this rubric point. Discuss who will communicate with leadership and
stakeholders. (Who, what, when, where). This info will come from your CPE.
E5. Evaluation The discussion
details a specific,
measurable, and
clear plan for
evaluation. The
connection to the
purpose statement
and innovation goal
is clear.
This connects back to A5 and A6 of the purpose statement and the SMART-C format. Describe what
the success of innovation would look like. You can measure success with a benchmark or goal. One
measure to evaluate is if the SMART-C goal was met.
F1. Purpose and
Rationale
The submission
reiterates the
purpose statement
and rationale, and
both are clear,
accurate, and
relevant to the
proposed
innovation.
Explain the purpose of the proposed innovation. This is essentially a conclusion that incorporates
rubric sections A5 and A6, the purpose statement and SMART-C goal.
F2. Reflection The reflection is insightful as it relates to the key
tenets of the process of innovation. Significant
personal experiences with the process of
innovation are referenced.
Students may write this reflection of the development of this
innovation proposal in first person.
F3. Strengths and
Challenges
The discussion includes specific and relevant
examples of strengths and challenges relating to
the process of developing the proposed
innovation plan.
Name a few strengths and challenges that you and / or CoP
encountered during the CPE. Describe lessons learned regarding what
worked well, as well as obstacles encountered while working with
the innovation team and/or on the CPE activities.
F4. Future
Initiatives
The discussion of how lessons learned from this
experience can be applied to future initiatives is
clear, insightful, and logical.
Describe lessons learned regarding what worked well, as well as
obstacles encountered while working with the CoP and/or on the CPE
activities. How can lessons learned during the CPE and PA task process
be applied to future innovations?
G. APA Sources The submission includes in-text citations and
references for content that is quoted,
paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a
consistent application of APA style.
The references provided in the D031 paper template are examples of
APA formatted documents. Be sure to DELETE any references in the
template that you have not cited in the body of the paper.
https://apastyle.apa.org/blog
https://cm.wgu.edu/t5/Writing-Center-Knowledge-Base/I-Need-Help-
with-APA-7th-Edition-Style/ta-p/33524
H. Professional
Communication
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized,
and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in
the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology
is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively
conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics,
usage, and grammar promote accurate
interpretation and understanding.
WGU Writing Center is a great resource for writing tips.
The Writing Center offers a variety of options for student
support for APA, professional communication concerns, and the writing
process, ranging from self-serve resources to live events. Encourage
students to use these resources as soon as they begin writing a task.
One-on-one student appointments should be reserved for students
with the greatest need. If the student needs a one-on-one session,
please contact the Writing Center at [email protected]
Running head: TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 1
Tracking Supplies in the Emergency Room
NAME
College of Health Professions, Western Governors University
D031: Advancing Evidence-Based Innovation in Nursing Practice
TEACHER
12/20/2021
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 2
Tracking and Accounting for Supplies in the Emergency Room
(A)Innovation Proposal
Working in the Emergency Room has its challenges; one of those challenges is not having
enough supplies. This could be from multiple patients with the same complaint, overuse of
product, or supply chain shortages in receiving the product. Due to the 2020 pandemic, there
have been disruptions in supply chain distribution. Healthcare is being directly affected; as
stated by Reed (2021), “Shortage of health care supplies can quickly jump from a nuisance to a
life-or-death proposition. They indicate serious vulnerabilities in the U.S. health care supply
chain.” The supply chain issue has forced healthcare workers to be innovators, thinking smarter,
not harder, becoming creative engineers when the supply is unavailable, and minimizing what is
needed for the desired outcome. Healthcare facilities have been working through short supplies
for over a year due to supply chain disruption and inappropriate or overuse of materials for
specific procedures. In the chaos of the ER, in a critical situation, we are finding too many
supplies are getting opened and not used. For example, a critical patient could need a central line
for certain medications; two central-line kits get opened on accident, one gets used, and one gets
thrown away. This waste is decreasing what is already low and unavailable.
An innovative way to track supplies and decrease unusable supplies is an electronic
tracking system. All items are scanned under the patient’s name before being taken out of the
supply room. Inventory tracking systems would be a costly upfront expenditure. Still, it would
be cost-effective with long-term use by reducing unused materials inventory protection,
improving inventory count accuracy, and accurately charging a patient for materials used
(Healthie, 2021). There will also be a designated procedure supply quick reference flipchart for
staff to gather only the necessary supplies needed. Hoping to decrease the number of supplies
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 3
opened and not used for a procedure.
Role of Innovative Nurse Leader
The seventh provision in the American Nurses Association code of ethics states, “The
nurse, in all roles and settings, advances the profession through research and scholarly inquiry,
professional standards development, and the generation of both nursing and health policy.”
Meaning a nurse must advocate for change. The role of a nurse innovator is to be an agent of
change by supporting technological advancements, continuing education, aiding in the
innovation process with input, as consultants, participating in research, and data gathering
(Thomas. TW, et al., 2016). Characteristics of being an innovative nurse leader are supporting
proactive thinking and facilitating a growth mindset by promoting the nursing process, critical
thinking, experience, and teamwork to provide positive outcomes, such as new models of
efficient care, processes, safety practices, and new policies.
In being an innovative nurse, I propose a better way of tracking the supplies in the
emergency room (ER) where I currently work by installing a bar code scanning system to keep
an up-to-date, accurate inventory in the ER. As well as a quick reference flip chart of supplies
needed for emergent procedures completed in the ER. Due to supply chain disruptions, supplies
are limited; we cannot afford to waste or not use all supplies opened. Yet there is no tracking
system for supplies, and there is no education on what is needed for emergent procedures
currently in the ER. This innovated way of tracking supplies, staff would have to scan each item
required before taking it out of the supply room. The quick reference flip chart of procedure
supplies will have a detailed list of what is needed for each procedure provided and where to find
it in the supply room. The flip chart will hang in the supply room next to the scanner, making it
easier to look up what is needed and scan the item. This would serve anyone in the ER,
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 4
including temporary staff. This would promote efficient care safety practices and support
technological advancements.
An anticipated disruption is staff not scanning the item before taking it out of the supply
room. This would be managed by proper education and explaining why this is an essential step
in the procedure process. Staff would be educated on scanning before removing the item, but
staff could scan items after being used in certain emergent situations. This would not be ideal,
but it is an alternative to getting the items scanned for inventory.
Summary of Community of Practice
My innovation plan is to better the process currently used in the Emergency Room to
track supplies. My agency is a small community hospital in a rural outskirt west of Salt Lake
City, Utah, run by Stewart Healthcare and in partnership with physician owners (Steward Health
Care. n.d-a). The hospital is a full functioning, five-floor facility, offering 24-hour emergency
care with onsite radiology, laboratory, woman, and newborn services, both emergent and elective
surgeries, as well as behavioral health. It is a trauma 3, stroke, and STEMI receiving facility and
has been labeled one of the busiest trauma three emergency rooms in the state (Steward Health
Care. (n.d-b). Staffed 24-hours with physicians, nurses, aids, and non-clinical staff.
Located in West Valley City, Utah population just over 133,000, second largest city in
Utah, with the leading population of Hispanic/Latino and Pacific Islander in the county (Biggest
US cities, 2021). The average health care coverage is 52.1% employer coverage, 18.3%
uninsured, 13.3% Medicaid, 6.2% Medicare, 1.2% military or VA benefits, and 8.8% non-
grouped, with the percent of uninsured citizens increasing in the last year due to the pandemic
(World population review, 2021). The average poverty level is 12.5% in the city and has the
highest crime and drug rates in Salt Lake County.
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 5
Identifying stakeholders were those directly involved with the hospital and department
processes and understanding the importance of maintaining an accurate account of materials,
supplies, and equipment. One of the most important and formal key stakeholders is the Chief
Nursing Officer (CNO) for the hospital. This role is essential due to the CNO’s responsibility to
manage budgets, oversee nursing processes, and overall patient care. It is the CNO’s role to
understand how this innovation will affect the Emergency Department/Room (ED/ER) and have
a ripple effect on other departments and patient care. The CNO will need to approve the
innovation funding and be a part of the implementation process. The following key stakeholder
in an informal role are the Physicians. The Hospital is a physician-owned partnership. Thus,
having the physicians involved is crucial to getting funding and approval for the innovation. It is
an informal role due to the lack of involvement the physicians will have in the actual innovation
process. Department directors of materials and ED are key stakeholders that will play an
essential formal part in the innovation. They know how their department operates and
understand where to help provide the best possible patient care. Having the directors involved in
the process will help facilitate the completion and education of the innovation. Charge nurses
have an informal role as stakeholders; it will be their responsibility to help educate the staff on
the new processes and represent the innovation once complete. Lastly, the nurses are key formal
stakeholders. It will be the nurse’s responsibility to maintain the innovation, help with
evaluation of the new process and help make changes as needed for the emergency department.
The number one goal of all the stakeholders is to provide good quality care. Jordan
Valley Medical Center, West Valley Campus’s mission statement reads, “to provide the
community with excellent healthcare.” To provide excellent healthcare, we need the supplies
and materials. This innovation will allow us to track supplies, better understand what is required
for each procedure in the ER, and help the ER be better prepared to provide excellent healthcare
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 6
to one of Salt Lake County’s highest poverty communities. Knowing what is available is key to
learning how to handle a situation when it arises in the Emergency Room. Each stakeholder
understands this and is willing and able to do their part in making sure we succeed as a
department and as a hospital.
As stated at Jordan Valley Medical Center, West Valley Campus, the values they stand for
incorporate accountability – we encourage creative thinking to promote quality and excellence in
healthcare delivery and safety – we strive to provide a culture focused on reducing the risk of
harm, on naming two (Steward Health Care. n.d-a). These two values precisely align with the
goal of the innovation to have an electronic inventory tracking system and a quick reference
procedure supply flipchart. The innovation has promoted creative thinking that will ultimately
help nurses in the ER be accountable for the supplies needed for patient care, decreasing costs,
keeping an accurate inventory log, reducing the risk of not being prepared with what is available
in doing so reducing the risk of harm and promote quality and excellent healthcare delivery.
Internal and External Factors
External factors that have prompted this innovation are the shortage of healthcare
supplies and the supply chain issues arising across the nation. Low supplies or no supplies
available have forced nursing staff to think creatively about caring for patients. I am not only a
nurse in the ER, but I also do all the ordering and management of supplies for the ER. I am in
constant contact with the materials department. I receive updates from manufacturers on back-
ordered items or how they are not receiving the materials needed to make their products.
Internal factors have changed due to the external factors and what is available. In the ER,
it is essential always to be prepared; it is never known what will come in next. But due to
limited supplies, it has changed how, we as ER nurses, prepare for patients and situations.
Instead of opening all potential items or supplies, we now get the things out but do not open
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 7
them until they are needed. This has decreased the number of supplies going to waste due to not
being opened. It has caused a delay in responding to situations because now we have to open the
item and set it up to use. An example of this would be suction supplies. In my facility,
disposable suction canisters are on backorder from the manufacturer. In the past, I would open
all items and set it all up if there was the potential; I would need to suction my patient. Now I
get it all out and sit on the side until I know I will need it. There have been occasions where I
have required suction but did not have any of the supplies. This puts stress on me as the nurse,
me as the one responsible for ordering supplies, the charge nurse is trying to help gather supplies,
materials department in not having or running allocated supplies to the ER, and the hospital for
not appearing to be fully equipped and ready to take care of patients. Thus, therefore I feel it is
essential for this innovation of a tracking system in the ER to prevent unneeded stress and the
potential for harm.
Innovation Alignment
A part of hospital management is making sure the right product is available for the
patient; there has been an increase in the quality compromising of supplies. The Joint
Commission is a “Global driver of quality improvement and patient safety in health care.” (Joint
Commission, 2022). The goal of the Joint Commission is to make sure all facets of health care
practices are safe, including the supply chain. In 2017 Joint Commission came out with The
Effect of Illicit Supply Chains on Patient Safety, A White Paper, outlining the dangers of supply
chain management and non-regulatory medical devices. In the executive summary, it states,
“Counterfeit, contaminated, adulterated, diverted, quality-compromised, and/or illegally
obtained medical devices and supplies are on the increase… and this reality poses a
significant risk to patient safety and health care organization integrity.”
(Mansur, J., Joint Commission International. 2017)
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 8
This is truer now than in 2017. The supply chain has been internationally affected by the 2020
pandemic global shutdown. Multiple national lockdowns continue to slow or even temporarily
stop the flow of raw materials and finished goods, disrupting manufacturing as a result (Harapko,
2021). Healthcare facilities are in desperate need of some specific medical equipment. There is
a threat that supplies are in danger of being counterfeited, contaminated, adulterated, diverted,
quality-compromised, and illegally obtained, making supply management even more critical and
necessary. For example, at my facility, 10cc saline flushes were on backorder and allocated
throughout the Utah region hospitals. The supplier has been unable to get the materials needed to
manufacture flushes. Being a nurse, that is something that seems simple yet necessary to proper
healthcare delivery. To make our own flushes, the rules and regulations were such that our
facility did not have the right equipment. This innovation will help track the number of flushes
used and keep an inventory of what is left to help manage the quantity for the specific
departments and the hospital while keeping within the Joint Commissions’ guidelines for safe
and proper materials handling.
Purpose of the Innovation
The innovation aims to implement an electronic tracking system for supplies to improve
tracking inventory to ensure the appropriate supplies are available for optimal quality healthcare.
With the goals of limiting the unused supply waste, have an up-to-date account of supplies
readily available, be prepared for supply shortages, and list proper equipment and supplies
needed for each procedure completed in the emergency department.
Goal for the Innovation
The goal for the innovation is to support healthcare workers in the emergency department
with appropriate materials needed to promote positive patient outcomes, increase supplies,
and be better prepared for future supply chain issues. Within a year of the electronic
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 9
inventory tracking system, it will be measured by the increase in supply inventory, amount of
money saved on acquiring priority items when stock is low instead of entirely out, and paying
the premium by having an up-to-date inventory list and decrease patient incidences with poor
outcomes. The challenge of this innovation is the transition time when the electronic tracking
system is being installed, education on the system, and the introduction of the system for use.
(B) Relevant Sources Review
Table 1: Relevant Sources Summary Table
Reference Citation Relevant Findings
Evidence
Strength
Evidence
Hierarchy
Sardar M. N. Islam. (2020).
Digitalization of Supply Chain
Management and Firm
Performance: Structural
Equation Modeling and
Empirical Findings. Nova.
https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/e
bookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXz
IyNTY5NDlfX0FO0?
sid=20c37627-3302-424d-b0ff-
[email protected]&vid=9&h
id=http://eds.s.ebscohost.com/&f
ormat=EB
This book examines whether digitalization
in supply chain management is adequate
and the impacts on the organization. The
author developed and tested a framework
model that proposes supply chain
capabilities using information
technologies from researching different
information technologies available. A
quantitative methodology was used to
examine other information technologies
for the supply chain management. The
results indicated that electronic integration
had a positive impact on the organization.
Thus, this study further proves that the
proposed innovation will positively
impact the hospital, staff, and patients.
Level V Meta-
syntheses
Dharmapalan, V., O’Brien, W. J.
(2018) Benefits and Challenges
of Automated Materials
Technology in Industrial
Construction projects.
Proceedings of the Institution of
Civil Engineers – Smart
Infrastructure and Construction
171(4): 144–157,
https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.19.
00009
Even though this article has to do with
construction sites, I was interested in the
positives and negatives found with the use
of automated materials locating and
tracking technologies (AMLTTs). The
benefits were accurate and timely material
information, reduced misplacement, and
optimized logistics. Some challenges are
data integration, data management,
maintenance costs, lack of
implementation, and process knowledge.
I gained some new insight into some
Level VI Qualitative
research
method
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 10
challenges I did not think of.
Harris, A. M., Harris, C. M.
(2019). Methods for Improving
Materials Management.
Physician Leadership Journal,
6(4), 55-60.
https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/p
dfviewer/pdfviewer?
vid=26&sid=20c37627-3302-
424d-b0ff-
a9e36d5d0675%40redis
The title caught my attention, and I feel
like this is a very similar problem that the
proposed innovation will fix. In this
article, a multidisciplinary team of OR
staff was put together to come up with a
solution to fix the inventory problem in
the OR. A timed delivery Kanban card
system (TDKCS) was used to improve
support the material management.
Flowsheets were used to educate OR staff
on the new inventory process. It reports
advantages such as minimal cost for
implementing and maintaining, improving
financials, decreasing expedited freight,
and increasing staff presence with
patients, potentially increasing patient
safety and satisfaction. The most
significant disadvantage mentioned was
the rapport and trust between the two
departments, materials management and
OR. I feel this disadvantage is also
concerning to implementing the proposed
innovation. To help manage this
disadvantage was small integration at a
time. Unfortunately, that will not be the
case with this innovation.
Level VII Quality
Improvement
Projects
Francis, J.R. (2020).
Implications for Supply Chain
Management. Frontiers of
Health Services Management,
37(1), 33-38.
https://doi.org/10.1097/HAP.000
0000000000092
This article explains how the pandemic
affected the supply chain to the Mayo
clinic. It describes how task forces were
created to figure out how the Mayo Clinic
would get supplies to care for patients,
how the was an enterprise collaboration
with standardized practices, conservation
of PPE, and new sources of PPE such as
making face shields from 3D printers. It
explains how the lessons learned from the
pandemic have shifted the preservation of
supplies. How having an innovative
culture has proven beneficial, and how all
healthcare needs to acquire new
innovation skills. It states that investing
in inventory management technology is
imperative, creating a balance of
inventory and distribution is necessary.
Level VII Specialist
Opinions
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 11
Sarkis, J. (2020). Supply chain
sustainability: learning from the
COVID-19
pandemic. International Journal
of Operations & Production
Management, 41(1), 63-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM
-08-2020-0568
This article provides insight for a
sustainable supply chain in post covid
pandemic conditions. It explains how the
supply chain has been affected
internationally and how it has turned to a
buy local focus. But with buying local,
there are concerns about how it will affect
the economy and ecosystem, focusing on
being green for the environment. It talks
about how technology has been
transformed, more people working from
home, and more technology used to help
decrease the number of people, thus
promoting social distancing. Companies
need to focus on circular economy and
sharing economy to positively impact
supply chain sustainability and resilience.
Level VII Specialist
Opinions
Synthesis of the Literature
I reviewed several sources concerning supply chain management and the effects of the
covid pandemic. Sources revealed a pattern of how preparation is a key in preventing supply
chain disruptions. Whether relationships with multiple supplies, innovated thinking, better
storage capability, buying local, and a more efficient way of handling and tracking supplies. The
trends focus on more technology and fewer people involved with materials management, such as
using an automated handling system and tracking system. Yet also focused on how healthcare
workers need to innovate with supplies available, not wasteful, and accountable. I feel the gaps
in some articles are how it was presented that healthcare workers need to be more responsible for
supplies. I agree with that statement; some of the articles do not understand what it is like to
work with patients and need supplies. The proposed innovation is to help with this situation.
Still, it is being handled by individuals who work with patients and understand what needs to
happen to be both accountable for supplies yet not being detrimental to the patient. I felt some
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 12
articles were written by individuals who do not work with patients and have unrealistic
expectations of handling supplies.
Recommendations for the Innovation
The article Methods for Improving Materials Management talked about how the OR staff
was affected by low supplies and how staff would hide supplies in lockers for a “just in case”
situation (Harris. Harris, 2019). That is something that is happening where I work. They could
find a solution by including the OR staff in using a Kandan card system. Staff was educated on
the system; small steps were taken to implement the plan until a successful and less stressful
transition. I recommend the proposed innovation take the same approach with small steps in the
transition of the supply room tracking. First, introduce the procedure supply flipchart to the
staff. This gives the staff opportunity to become familiar with what is needed for the standard
procedures in the emergency room. Then reorganize the supply room; when that is complete,
allow staff time to get used to where items are located before implementing scanning. Allowing
staff time to become familiar with procedures and where supplies are located in the newly
reorganized supply room will help decrease staff stress with all changes happening at once.
When the scanning is implemented, the staff can then focus on scanning because they will
already have confidence in the supply room.
(C) Methods
Process to Generate Ideas
A meeting was held with the stakeholders of the emergency room, including the head
medical physician, the ED director, ED leadership team, both day and night shift charge nurses,
and chief nursing officer for the hospital. Each stakeholder presented a concern for the
emergency department. After each concern was discussed, it was concluded that each concern
centered on supply availability and materials management. Stakeholders presented a further
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 13
discussion on how the problem could be fixed. It was discussed that the solution must be easy to
use, readily available for days and nights, keep an up-to-date inventory of supplies and notify the
appropriate individuals when supplies are low. Using the consensus decision-making process, it
was voted that an electronic scanning system was needed. This would be an easy, always
available, and automatically update the inventory. An ED procedure flipchart in the supply room
was also discussed with what is needed for standard procedures done in the ED to prevent
multiple items from being opened and unused.
Examples of Big and Small Data in the Organization
Big data is a term used to describe large, fast, or complex data that is difficult or
impossible to process using traditional methods (SAS Institute, 2021). In the emergency room,
about materials and supplies, an example of big data would be the number of alcohol prep swabs
used in a day. The amount is large, accumulates fast, and is impossible to count without
technological help. Small data is data in a volume and format that answers a specific question or
addresses a particular problem. An example of supplies in the emergency room would be the
number of central lines placed. That small data is specific to a type of patient and is easily
accounted for. Both the big and small data are relevant to the emergency room’s inventory needs.
How Big Data Supports the Innovation
Being responsible for the supplies in the emergency room, I must pay attention to the big
and small data about supplies and inventory. After assessing the increase in big data, increase in
patient volumes, and the stakeholders’ concerns, I realized how important it is to implement the
proposed innovation in electronic inventory tracking. The big data has been increasing with the
increase in patient volumes, yet it has become imperative to have an accurate inventory due to
supply chain disruptions. It would be impossible for me to count and manage alcohol prep
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 14
swabs, but an electronic system that automatically counted and distributed the appropriate count
of swabs is necessary to maintain adequate supplies for the emergency room.
Technology Enhancements for the Innovation
An electronic tracking system for the emergency department supply room is an easy way
to keep an accurate and up-to-date inventory. Material management uses a similar approach to
manage the supplies for the hospital. The same concept would be used in the ER for supplies,
including specialty items. The proposed innovation would use a computerized system integrated
with the hospital system to automatically charge the patient for the appropriate items and send
alerts when supplies are running low. The amount of money saved with decreasing the number
of duplicate supplies opened and unused, charges to the patient, and money saved on rushed
items is a plausible justification for the up-front cost of the tracking system, installation, and
maintenance.
(D) Interprofessional Collaboration and Disruptive Innovation
Disruption of Innovation and Impact
Disruptive innovations cause radical changes, using technology to disrupt the usual
market to the extent that it creates a ripple effect throughout the industry to create a new market
(Twin, 2021). Over the years, healthcare has had positive disruptions in technological
advancements that have changed how healthcare is performed, documented, financed, and
supplied. This proposed innovation will be one of those positive disruptions for specifically the
emergency room but also the hospital organization. It will change the inventory process for the
ER staff and materials management and affect the operation of charges and payments for
supplies to both outside vendors and patients. ER staff will become responsible for scanning
supplies under the patient’s name, thus creating an account for the item in the patient’s chart. At
the end of the patient’s visit, there will be an itemized list of supplies used and charges. Also,
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 15
when scanning the item, the system automatically updates the inventory list and alerts when
items are running low, preventing supply depletion.
A concerning challenge is noncompliance from staff not scanning items appropriately. A
buffer will need to be integrated into the system to manage charges of supplies set forth by the
hospital administration and financial team. This buffer would contain what items would be cost-
effective to charge for and those not. Also, inappropriately scanning the up-to-date inventory
will be inaccurate and could cause supplies to run out before more are ordered. Weekly checks
would be necessary to verify inventory. These checks would be fast and efficient compared to
the current process.
Strategies to Address the Challenges
To reduce noncompliance with ER staff, preparation and education are essential. With
the slow changes to the supply room and integration of the new system, staff will have education
opportunities to explore the supply room and the new tracking system process before
implementation. If an employee continues to have noncompliance, one on one education will be
conducted by ER leadership to reinforce the importance and necessity of the new process.
Benefits of Disruptive Innovation
The proposed disruptive innovation will be financially inconvenient with upfront costs of
the system, materials, set up, implementation, and maintenance. The anticipated financial gains
from maintaining supplies by having an up-to-date inventory, not paying premium prices for
rushed items, and decreasing the amount of opened wasted supplies will not be immediately
seen. As the ER staff uses the tracking system, there will be a slow incline in savings but will be
cost-effective over time. Positive patient outcomes will have an immediate response by having
the appropriate supplies available to treat patients. This will allow the hospital to admit more
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 16
patients increasing revenue, rather than transferring to other hospitals losing the potential
revenue.
(E) Pre-Implementation Plan
Diffusion of Innovation
E.M. Rogers developed the Diffusion of Innovation Theory in 1962. Originating to
explain how, in communication, an idea or product gains momentum over time and diffuses or
spreads through a specific social population or system. Resulting in the adoption of a new idea,
behavior, or product. (Singer, 2019). Adoption is a process influenced by the persons or social
system apt to adopt the innovation. To promote an innovation, behavior, or product, it is
essential to understand the proposed adopters’ characteristics or apt of adoption. There are five
established adopter categories innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, laggards.
Innovators and early adopters are leaders; they do not need to be convinced of the change; they
embrace change opportunities, are aware of the need for change, are willing to learn, and take
risks on change. Early majority adopters are rarely leaders, they will adapt to new ideas, but they
need to see evidence first. The late majority are skeptical of change will only adopt after others
have tried and adopted. Laggards are the “old school” mentality, bound by tradition, wary of
change, and the hardest to convince. After understanding the adopter type, there are stages or a
process by which an innovation is adopted. Stages are knowledge, persuasion, decision,
implementation, and confirmation. The knowledge stage is where innovation is introduced.
Persuasion is when a person is ascertaining and exploring the innovation. It is critical in this
stage that the innovation is perceived as beneficial. Decision is when it is decided whether the
innovation will be accepted or rejected. Implementation is putting the innovation into practice.
Confirmation is the evaluation of the innovation.
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 17
The emergency room where I work is staffed with nurses who have less than five years’
experience. This new generation of nurses are early majority adopters; they embrace changes
and technology. They see and understand how new innovations and technology will help with
the workload, patient care, and positive outcomes. This is the key population target during the
knowledge and persuasion stage of implementing the proposed innovation. Introducing them to
the innovation, allowing them to see and use the scanning and tracking tool, will help persuade
them of the necessity of the innovation. The stakeholders will need to know how the staff
promotes or declines the innovation to decide to go forward with implementation. Inviting
stakeholders to participate with staff as the innovation is explored will concrete the decision to
implement. A barrier to the decision stage is influenced by the late majority or laggard nurses are
communicating with the stakeholders during the persuasion stage. It will be imperative to ensure
the stakeholders see both the early and late majority point of view. The implementation stage
will be a slow process not to overwhelm and allow the ER staff time to integrate the system into
their care routine.
Innovation Action Plan
Table 2 – Innovation Action Plan
Responsible Person
(Role) Responsibilities Timeline
Martha – CNO Approval of innovation, provide financial support. 1 month
Dawn – Materials
Management manager
Set up Vendors 1 month
Zak – Information System Set up new system and integrate into current
system.
6 months
Allan – Maintenance Install devices into the supply room 1 Month
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 18
Dawn & Meghann Learn and educate staff on the system 3 months
Financial Implications
My innovation plan may be expensive upfront with the cost of the system, equipment,
and set up; however, over time, the tracking system, inventory managing, and positive patient
outcomes will prove beneficial not just for the emergency room but also for the hospital the
community. During the planning stage, there will be minimal costs. Vendors will be invited to
meet with stakeholders to discuss different tracking systems. Once a system is decided,
implementation will be the most expensive part of the plan. Equipment will need to be obtained,
installed, and programmed. The computerized tracking system will need to be integrated with
the hospital’s current charging system and the new system installed in the emergency room. In
my ER, we have a “superuser” for the different systems and processes; their job is to help
educate and troubleshoot when needed. It is a voluntary position and has no pay increase. I
would volunteer for this position as I am already in charge of supplies and ordering. Staff
education would happen on preplanned department meetings and skills day. This will eliminate
the cost of paying staff to come in and learn the system. Reinforced training will occur at shift
huddles. Extra expenditure on staff will be in the first few weeks of go-live when myself, other
super users, and vendors are there to help as needed.
Evaluation of the system will come six months after the implementation as completed
with minimal to no monetary expenditure. An accurate inventory list will be up-to-date and
verified; the amount spent on special rush supplies will be decreased due to ordering the item
before it is out and a rush is needed. The amount of unused supply waste will be down. The
return on investment will show a profit after a year, with most of the return coming from patient
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 19
admission because the supplies needed to care for the patient will be readily available. This will
have a positive financial gain for the hospital, the patients, and the community. If patients are
transferred to a different facility, there is an increased cost to the patient with travel, time off of
work, and cost of the new facility. Keeping the patient close to their homes and families will
promote more people in the community to use the hospital and services.
Interprofessional Communication Plan
The interprofessional communication plan will consist of communication with the
project manager and leadership members from the different involved departments such as
materials management, information systems (I.S.), emergency room, education, quality and risk
management, and stakeholders. It will be decided ahead of time if meetings will be in person or
via Zoom. Monthly meetings will be held during the planning stage to allow sufficient time to
plan for the implementation stage. Once implementation has started, weekly meetings with
updates will be necessary to keep the plan on a timetable, address issues or make changes.
All communication will be conducted through the department leadership members; it will
be up to them to determine how to get the information to their staff. During the installation and
integration of the tracking system, staff education will start with an online introduction to the
system. As installation is near completion, ER staff, super users, and materials management will
receive hands-on training and educate their departments. Before go-live, all staff in involved
departments will have an opportunity to use the system and will be required to have a proficiency
pass off. During go-live, a vendor representative will answer questions and assist staff as
needed.
Evaluation of the Innovation
The purpose of innovation is to support healthcare workers in the emergency department
with appropriate materials to promote positive patient outcomes, increase supplies, and prepare
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 20
for future supply chain issues. To evaluate the effectiveness of the innovation, data will need to
be collected over a year. Data such as financial records of materials for the department, number
of admissions, number of transfers with indications as to why transferred, up-to-date inventory
list matches current ER inventory, and a survey to ER staff getting their opinion if inventory has
increased, the ER procedure flipchart is helpful and if there is unused waste. All data will be
compared with previous years’ pre-pandemic and during a pandemic to see if the new system
saves money, increases supplies, and has positive patient outcomes. After analyzing the data, we
will evaluate if the tracking system was a success.
(F) Conclusion
I choose to implement an electronic supply tracking system for the Emergency Room.
Due to the supply chain issues and lack of material happening globally, my proposed innovation
will keep an up-to-date inventory list, allow ample time to order new supplies when there are low
item counts, decrease unused items, increase staff knowledge on items used for procedures in the
ER and in so improve patient outcomes.
I am responsible for the supplies in the ER where I work, and as such, I have to keep a
list of items on short supply and or back-ordered. This list has been growing over the last two
years, and there is no end in sight with the current state of the supply chain globally. I have had
to work closely with the materials management department to find alternatives for saline flushes,
Coban, and chest tube suction devices. While discussing with my stakeholders, supplies are the
central thesis of many issues in the ER. I proposed an electronic tracking system that would help
manage supplies and education for the staff on what is needed for procedures in the ER,
eliminating duplicate items opened, unused, and wasted.
The process of implementing the innovation was lengthy and required multiple team
members. One of the challenges was finding the appropriate program that met all the
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 21
requirements to work with the current charting program and was affordable. It was a valuable
experience for me to sit through vendor meetings to watch and listen as the CNO, CFO, and
materials director would ask questions on the different systems and discuss the pros and cons.
The strengths were working with the team at the hospital to get the necessary equipment installed
and educating the staff. Participating in skills day and educating the ER allowed me to have a
better relationship with my co-workers. I feel it has been a success. I have seen a decrease in the
number of orders I am putting in and the number of opened and unused supplies. Staff have told
me how helpful the flipchart is and decreased items they thought were needed for a procedure.
This process has helped me appreciate all that goes into new processes in healthcare.
Many factors must be accounted for, multiple people that need to be in agreeance, how it is going
to be financially supported and what the long terms effects will be. I feel I was able to make a
positive impact with this innovation for my department, hospital, and community. I have learned
what I need to do to foster innovation in myself, but I feel innovation needs to be promoted more
readily in healthcare. With the variety in nursing positions, the changes from evidence-based
knowledge, lack of supplies, and a new generation of nurses coming into the field. As I work
towards furthering my education and my position in healthcare, I want to instill the basic
understanding of innovation and encourage nurses and healthcare workers to think outside the
box.
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 22
References
American Nurses Association. (2015). Code of ethics with interpretative statements. Silver
Spring, MD: Author.
http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/EthicsStandards/CodeofEthicsforNur
ses/Code-ofEthics-For-Nurses.htm
Biggest US Cities. (2021, Dec 31). West Valley City, Utah Demographics.
https://www.biggestuscities.com/demographics/ut/west-valley-city-city
Cianelli, R., Clipper, B., Freeman, R., Goldstein, J., & Wyatt, T. H. (2016). The innovation road
map: A guide for nurse leaders.
https://www.nursingworld.org/globalassets/ana/innovations-roadmap-english.pdf
Dharmapalan, V., O’Brien, W. J. (2018) Benefits and Challenges of Automated Materials
Technology in Industrial Construction projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers – Smart Infrastructure and Construction 171(4): 144–157,
https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.19.00009
Francis, J.R. (2020). Implications for Supply Chain Management. Frontiers of Health Services
Management, 37(1), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/HAP.0000000000000092
Harapko, Sean. (2021, Feb 18). How COVID-19 impacted supply chains and what comes next.
EY. https://www.ey.com/en_us/supply-chain/how-covid-19-impacted-supply-chains-and-
what-comes-next
Harris, A. M., Harris, C. M. (2019). Methods for Improving Materials Management. Physician
Leadership Journal, 6(4), 55-60. https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
vid=26&sid=20c37627-3302-424d-b0ff-a9e36d5d0675%40redis
Healthie. (2021). Guide to healthcare inventory management systems.
https://www.gethealthie.com/blog/guide-to-healthcare-inventory-management-systems
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 23
Mansur, Jeannell M., Joint Commission International. (2017). The effect of illicit supply chains
on patient safety, a white paper. Joint Commission International.
https://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/-/media/jci/jci-documents/offerings/other-
resources/white-papers/jci_white_paper_effect_of_illicit_supply_chains.pdf
Reed, Tina. (2021, November 1). Health care plagued by new supply chain shortages. Axios.
https://www.axios.com/health-care-plagued-by-new-supply-chain-shortages-4366675c-
a984-483d-8996-ce70cf8b3656.html
SAS Institute. (2021). Big Data: What it is and why it matters. SAS India.
https://www.sas.com/en_in/insights/big-data/what-is-big-data.html
Sardar M. N. Islam. (2020). Digitalization of Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance:
Structural Equation Modeling and Empirical Findings. Nova.
https://eds.s.ebscohost.com/eds/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzIyNTY5NDlfX0FO0?
sid=20c37627-3302-424d-b0ff-
[email protected]&vid=9&hid=http://eds.s.ebscohost.com/&format=EB
Sarkis, J. (2020). Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19
pandemic. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(1), 63-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2020-0568
Singer, Leif. (2019). Behavioral Change Models, Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Boston
University School of Public Health. https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-
modules/sb/behavioralchangetheories/behavioralchangetheories4.html
Steward Health Care. (n.d-a). About Jordan Valley Medical Center – West Campus. Jordan Valley
Medical Center West Valley Campus, A Steward Family Hospital.
https://www.jordanwestvalley.org/about-us
TRACKING SUPPLIES IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM 24
Steward Health Care. (n.d-b). Jordan Valley West. My Steward Hospital.
https://www.mystewardhospital.org/jordanvalley/
The Joint Commission. (2022). About the Joint Commission.
https://www.jointcommission.org/about-us/70-years-of-patient-safety-and-quality-
healthcare/
Thomas, T.W., Seifert, P.C., Joyner, J.C., (September 30, 2016) “Registered Nurses Leading
Innovative Changes” OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol. 21, No. 3,
Manuscript 3.
http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJ
IN/TableofContents/Vol-21-2016/No3-Sept-2016/Registered-Nurses-Leading-Innovative-
Changes.html#ANAa
Twin, Alexandra. (2021, August 23). Disruptive Innovation. Investopedia.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/disruptive-innovation.asp
World Population Review. (2021). West Valley City, Utah Population 2021.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/west-valley-city-ut-population
2
Title of Evidence-Based Innovation Plan
Author Name (First, Middle Initial, Last)
College of Health Professions, Western Governors University
D031: Advancing Evidence-Based Innovation in Nursing Practice
Instructor Name
Date
Title of Evidence-Based Innovation Plan
Introduction (Introduce your innovation proposal in 2-3 sentences)
Explanation of Role
Organizational Characteristics
Demographics
Team Members Roles
Shared Team Values
Discussion of Internal and External Factors
Alignment to Strategic Initiatives
Purpose Statement
Innovation Goal
Relevant Sources Review
Table 1
Relevant Sources Summary Table
Scholarly Peer-Reviewed Sources Published in Past 5 Years that Support the Proposed Innovation |
Summary of Findings Relevant to Proposed Innovation |
Evidence Strength Level I–VII |
Evidence Hierarchy
|
|
APA formatted scholarly reference with a DOI or retrievable link. |
Present a detailed summary of the findings and how the findings support the proposed innovation. |
Refer to
|
||
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 1 |
||||
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 2 |
||||
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 3 |
||||
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 4 |
||||
SCHOLARLY SOURCE 5 |
Synthesis of Literature
Recommendations
Data-Collection and Technology
Idea Generation Process
Data Examples
Big Data Support
Technology Enhancements
Interprofessional Collaboration and Disruptive Innovation
Disruption
Strategies to Mitigate Challenges
Leverage Benefits of Disruptive Innovation
Plan
Diffusion of Innovation
Innovation Action Plan Table
Table 2
Innovation Action Plan
Team Member Role |
Essential Responsibilities to Implement Proposal |
Timeline |
Financial Implications
Interprofessional Communication Plan
Evaluation
Purpose and Rationale
Reflection
Strengths and Challenges
Future Initiatives
References
Are you stuck with another assignment? Use our paper writing service to score better grades and meet your deadlines. We are here to help!
Order a Similar Paper
Order a Different Paper
