Identified priority issues for national and global health

If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality, and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. We are the ideal place for all your writing needs.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

can someone help me with this?

Epidemiology of Selected Health Issue

1.

2.

3.

 

Instructions

In this assignment, you will define, describe, and examine the pathogenesis of your previously identified health issue or problem.

Write a formal APA paper on the epidemiology of your selected health topic the meets the following requirements:

· length between 3-5 pages (does not include title or references pages)

· include a title page

· an introduction and conclusion

· in-text citations

· at least three (3) professional references

· No abstract is needed

This should be written as a scientific paper which includes at least one (1) data table within the body of your paper that will support your statements. Use your data source to create an original data table. Please 
do not cut and paste a data table. Please use the following subheadings below as APA headings in the body of your paper:

· Pathogenesis of the health issue or disease 

· Data Display (As a table per APA format)

· Conclusions

· References

Review the literature about your chosen health issue, and present salient points.

Present the data related to the spread of the health issue or problem in chart, graph, or table form.

Conclusions about the impact of health issue or problem on the population are drawn from the data.

At least 3 professional references are required.

Complete this paper and submit it to this assignment dropbox.  This assignment is due by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.

Estimated time to complete: 8 hours

Rubric

NSG423 Paper Rubric 3

NSG423 Paper Rubric 3

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

15 pts

5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.

13.5 pts

4

Identifies a creative, focused and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.

12 pts

3

Identifies a focused and manageable/ doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.

10.5 pts

2

Identifies a topic that while manageable/ doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.

9 pts

1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.

0 pts

0

Does not clearly identify a topics that is relative to the assignment.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views

15 pts

5

Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.

13.5 pts

4

Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.

12 pts

3

Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/ approaches.

10.5 pts

2

Relates information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

9 pts

1

Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.

0 pts

0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDesign Process

10 pts

5

All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

9 pts

4

Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.

8 pts

3

Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.

7 pts

2

Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.

6 pts

1

Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.

0 pts

0

The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

15 pts

5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

13.5 pts

4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

12 pts

3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

10.5 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

9 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

15 pts

5

States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.

13.5 pts

4

States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.

12 pts

3

States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.

10.5 pts

2

States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

9 pts

1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.

0 pts

0

States an illogical conclusion from inquiry findings.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

10 pts

5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

9 pts

4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8 pts

3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

7 pts

2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6 pts

1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0 pts

0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

5 pts

5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a stronger command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

4 pts

3

The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5 pts

Total Points: 90

Are you stuck with another assignment? Use our paper writing service to score better grades and meet your deadlines. We are here to help!


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
Writerbay.net